Share the proof a process actually needs.
Design issuer, holder and verifier experiences for digital credentials and controlled identity exchange. We connect credential lifecycle, status checking, consent and relying-party integration to the business process.
A shared record. A clear chain of responsibility.
See where signatures and shared records fit into a real enterprise workflow.
Establish the source
Define who supplies the record, what the source system verifies and who is allowed to sign.
Read the complete workflow
Establish the source
Define who supplies the record, what the source system verifies and who is allowed to sign.
A business record and identified issuer → An authorized signed assertion
Coordinate participants
Agree the participant permissions, validation rules and correction process before selecting the network design.
Signed record + network rules → A consistent shared event history
Connect the workflow
Connect records to enterprise systems and make the audit trail inspectable. A ledger records a claim; it does not independently prove the physical event.
Recorded event + integration scope → Traceable system updates
Controlled onboarding and eligibility records
Issuer and verifier application integration
Follow the work. Inspect the result.
Explore a proposed delivery workflow. Each step connects an activity to something your team can review.
Issuer, holder and verifier responsibilities
Credential claims and status requirements
Identity, consent and application interfaces
A credential schema and trust model
Agree issuer authority, claims, expiry and status rules. Identify the minimum information a relying process needs to receive.
Reviewed against agreed requirementsPractical artifacts. A shared definition of done.
The exact scope follows discovery. These are the building blocks we discuss, specify and review together.
- Issuer, holder and verifier journeys
- Credential schema and lifecycle
- Verification and status integration
- Consent and recovery design
Architecture with your operation in mind.
Issuer systems → signed credential → holder/presentation → verifier and status checks → relying workflow. Blockchain is optional; the trust and interoperability requirements determine the approach.
Designed around real constraints.
- Cryptographic verification confirms defined properties of a credential, not every underlying real-world claim.
- Identity assurance, privacy and legal acceptance depend on the chosen ecosystem and business requirements.
A product where it fits. A custom build where it matters.
Start with the claim a verifier needs and the authority behind it. Minimise the information exchanged around that purpose.
Bring your objective and the people it should help. We will shape a first scope and the evidence needed to move forward.
Discuss this projectYour starting point is carried into an editable inquiry. Nothing is booked or provisioned by making this selection.One plan. Visible progress.
A complete build, a focused integration or specialists alongside your team. The engagement follows the scope—not a fixed team template.
- 01
Discover
Define users, the process, constraints and a useful first measure of success.
- 02
Design
Make the interface, architecture, data and integration decisions visible.
- 03
Build & evaluate
Deliver working increments and test the task, permissions and difficult cases.
- 04
Release & evolve
Agree rollout, recovery, handover and the people responsible for ongoing operation.
Good questions. Clear answers.
Is blockchain required for digital credentials?
No. Credential formats and verification flows can work with different trust registries and infrastructure. We choose the design around the required ecosystem.
Can a credential be revoked or expire?
The lifecycle defines expiry, status checking and replacement or revocation rules where supported. Verifiers must use that information in their decision.
Tell us what needs to work better.
Explore with our AI guide, or reach the people who can scope the work.
